logo

65 pages 2 hours read

Austerlitz

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 2001

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Pages 21-50Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Pages 21-36 Summary

The narrator, who remains unidentified throughout the book, recounts a series of encounters he had with a man named Jacques Austerlitz during the narrator’s frequent trips from England to Belgium in the 1960s; these meetings with Austerlitz occurred over three decades, spanning to 1996.

The narrator begins his story: Back in 1967, he falls ill upon arriving by train to Centraal Station in Antwerp. After resting in a park, he visits Antwerp’s new nocturama, which contains an exotic collection of nocturnal animals. There appears in the text the first of the black-and-white photographs that are interspersed throughout the novel: four cropped close-ups of eyes, belonging to two nocturnal animals and two people. As the animals in the nocturama peer at the narrator with the penetrating gaze of a philosopher, he wonders whether the zookeepers turn on the lights at night so the animals can sleep.

The narrator’s memories from the nocturama blend with those from the salle des pas perdus, the concourse of the Centraal Station, to which he returned after the nocturama. In the twilight, under the 60-meter-high dome of the concourse, the few travelers look like one of the species from the nocturama, “the last members of a diminutive race which had perished or had been expelled from its homeland” (24).

One man in the concourse stands out because he’s photographing and making notes about the concourse. He has wavy hair and wears sturdy, aged clothes. The narrator approaches the man, Jacques Austerlitz, who readily answers his questions about his sketches. The two talk for hours in the station restaurant. Austerlitz explains King Leopold commissioned the station as a monument to Belgium’s newfound colonial prosperity in the 19th century. In the frieze inspired by the Roman Pantheon, symbols of industry and capital replace the Roman gods.

Standing above everything in the station—in the place once occupied by the figure of the holy emperor in ancient Rome—is a giant clock, a symbol of time. Austerlitz argues time has replaced divine authority: “all travelers ha[ve] to look up at the clock and [are] obliged to adjust their activities to its demands” (29). As they part, Austerlitz wonders how many workers died from mercury and cyanide fumes in the construction of the station’s giant mirrors—a question that in the text is left in French (in which the two men converse).

At their meeting the next day on the promenade by the Schelde River, Austerlitz mentions a painting by Lucas van Valckenborch depicting ice skaters on the river during the Little Ice Age in the 16th century. Austerlitz feels as if the moment depicted never ended; that the ice skater who has just fallen is condemned to fall again and again in a timeless loop.

Austerlitz tells the narrator he has spent his life studying monumental architecture, with a focus on railway stations. He’s learned that, contrary to their intimidating appearance, the grandest buildings betray the greatest degree of humanity’s insecurity. For example, in the 17th century, fortress design culminated in the star-shaped dodecagon, which was regarded as the perfect defensive structure. However, such fortresses were ineffective because their architects ignored three crucial facts: The biggest fortresses attract the largest forces, betray their weak points, and remain static in an ever-changing world. Even after a French army used newly developed mortars to level Antwerp’s star-shaped fortress in 1832, the city decided to build another fortress. To Austerlitz, this decision exemplifies the illogical attachment people have to an established model, despite evidence of its fatal flaws.

Austerlitz believes no one honestly prefers a monumental building to something smaller, such as a cottage, because lurking behind the monument there is the seed of its destruction:

At the most we gaze at it in wonder, a kind of wonder which in itself is a form of dawning horror, for somehow we know by instinct that outsize buildings cast the shadow of their own destruction before them, and are designed from the first with an eye to their later existence as ruins (36).

Pages 37-44 Summary

After Austerlitz leaves, the narrator sees an article about the nearby fortress of Breendonk, which Austerlitz mentioned. This coincidence prompts the narrator to visit the fortress.

In 1940, the Nazis converted Breendonk into a penal colony. Then, after the war, the Belgians made it into a World War II museum. Contrary to the image Austerlitz painted of a geometrically precise star-shaped fortress, the narrator finds an inhuman mass of concrete with no discernible architectural logic (pictured): “a monolithic, monstrous incarnation of ugliness and blind violence” (39). Past the execution ground lies a site where the Schutzstaffel (SS), a paramilitary Nazi organization, forced prisoners to move earth with primitive wheelbarrows. The narrator cannot imagine the prisoners struggling to the point of death to push these giant wheelbarrows over the scarred earth; however, inside the fort’s mess hall, he easily pictures the SS guards playing cards and writing to their families.

As he recalls this visit, the narrator’s memory is indistinct. He questions whether this is because he wants to forget what he saw or because Breendonk felt utterly disconnected from the natural world. He acknowledges how readily living records disappear:

[E]verything is constantly lapsing into oblivion with every extinguished life [...] the world is, as it were, draining itself, in that the history of countless places and objects which themselves have no power of memory is never heard, never described or passed on (42).

Deep in the fortress, the narrator enters a room containing a meat hook hanging over a drain. The nauseating smell of soap triggers his childhood memory of watching the town butcher hose blood off the shop’s tiles. Years after this 1967 visit to Breendonk, the narrator learns the SS would tie a prisoner’s hands behind his back before hoisting him by his hands until his shoulders broke. One fragmented, secondhand account includes that one man who suffered this torture, Gastone Novelli, found the sight of all Germans and so-called civilized people so repulsive after the war that he fled to the Amazon to live with an indigenous tribe. When Novelli later returned to Italy, he began drawing strings of differently-sized versions of the letter A—the primary sound in the Amazon tribe’s language—that resembled an undulating scream:

“AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA.”

Pages 45-50 Summary

Sometime later, at the Café des Espérances in the industrial area of Liège, the narrator encounters Austerlitz for the second time. In this meeting, as with those occurring later in the book, the two immediately continue their conversation without small talk or remarking on the unlikelihood of their meeting. Looking through a window down the darkened valley at the burning light of a giant iron foundry—a valley the narrator suspects once contained water meadows—Austerlitz mentions that in the 19th century, philanthropists failed in their ambition to build idyllic towns for workers and their families, instead constructing spartan barracks for lone workers. To Austerlitz, this exemplifies how the best-laid plans are unavoidably perverted when implemented.

Months later, the two encounter each other by the Palace of Justice in Brussels. The palace was hastily constructed in the 1880s, resulting in numerous doorless rooms and stairways leading nowhere. Austerlitz tells apocryphal stories of unofficial businesses sprouting in the forgotten rooms of the palace. This surprises the narrator because Austerlitz is usually rigorously objective.

During their final encounter in Belgium, on a ferry leaving Zeebrugge, the narrator learns two things about Austerlitz, who is reticent about his personal life: He is a lecturer of art history in London, and—unlike in French—he stutters and grips his glasses case when speaking English.

Pages 21-50 Analysis

Austerlitz is an unidentified narrator’s account of his conversations with the titular character, Jacques Austerlitz, over the course of three decades. Austerlitz first appears in the concourse of the train station in Antwerp as the only person studying his surroundings; he’s indirectly characterized as inquisitive and knowledgeable. That his clothes are well-made but outdated hints Austerlitz lives in the past; what drives the plot is his quest to identify the childhood tragedy haunting him.

The first “conversations” between the narrator and Austerlitz—which appear as monologues, not dialogues—introduce the book’s central themes. As an architectural historian, Austerlitz is interested in monumental architecture (such as the Centraal Station) as a record of the emergence of a new worldview after the Industrial Revolution. In this new world, capital and time replace the divine as the world’s primary governing forces, a shift indicated in the classically inspired train station by the replacement of Roman idols with symbols of capital and time (the clock).

Monumental buildings also record humanity’s obsession with perfection—and the needless death and destruction caused in pursuit of such perfection. Austerlitz thinks part of this obsession stems from our fear of harm. He implies we construct monumental buildings—which transcend us in their perfection—in an attempt to ward off this fear. Furthermore, this fear propels us to build endless defenses against “enemy powers.”

The 17th-century star-shaped fortress exemplifies the futility of pursuing the perfect defense. As architects refined fortress design, their theories became increasingly divorced from basic realities. Consequently, the more perfect the fortress, the worse it was at serving its defensive function. More than that, the conspicuous fortresses attracted the enemy they were constructed to repel. This suggests fear-driven projects often accomplish the opposite of their intention.

The close-up photographs of eyes, inserted in the text during the narrator’s description of his visit to the nocturama, introduce photographs as a device that both mirrors and supplements the text. The four sets of eyes—two human, two animal—are penetrating, reflecting the narrator’s description of the animals peering at him in the nocturama. The book will use descriptions of vision to explore a number of themes. That the narrator later describes Austerlitz as strongly resembling the philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein, whose eyes appear in the fourth photo, suggests Austerlitz shares the philosopher's unflinching analytic gaze. The third photograph offers subtext introducing a question of the boundary between fiction and real life. The eyes depicted belong to the painter Peter Tripp, a lifelong friend of Sebald, the author. This blurs the boundary between Sebald and Austerlitz, hinting at the author’s personal presence in the novel.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
Unlock IconUnlock all 65 pages of this Study Guide

Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.

Including features:

+ Mobile App
+ Printable PDF
+ Literary AI Tools